99+ Daron Acemoğlu Quotes on Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power - Quotes.pub

Here you will find all the famous Daron Acemoğlu quotes. There are more than 99+ quotes in our Daron Acemoğlu quotes collection. We have collected all of them and made stunning Daron Acemoğlu wallpapers & posters out of those quotes. You can use this wallpapers & posters on mobile, desktop, print and frame them or share them on the various social media platforms. You can download the quotes images in various different sizes for free. In the below list you can find quotes in various categories like Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power

every elite would, all else being equal, like to encourage as much growth as possible in order to have more to extract. Extractive institutions that have achieved at least a minimal degree of political centralization are often able to generate some amount of growth. What is crucial, however, is that growth under extractive institutions will not be sustained, for two key reasons. First, sustained economic growth requires innovation, and innovation cannot be decoupled from creative destruction, which replaces the old with the new in the economic realm and also destabilizes established power relations in politics. Because elites dominating extractive institutions fear creative destruction, they will resist it, and any growth that germinates under extractive institutions will be ultimately short lived. Second, the ability of those who dominate extractive institutions to benefit greatly at the expense of the rest of society implies that political power under extractive institutions is highly coveted, making many groups and individuals fight to obtain it. As a consequence, there will be powerful forces pushing societies under extractive institutions toward political instability.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
The situation was similar in the Soviet Union, with industry playing the role of sugar in the Caribbean. Industrial growth in the Soviet Union was further facilitated because its technology was so backward relative to what was available in Europe and the United States, so large gains could be reaped by reallocating resources to the industrial sector, even if all this was done inefficiently and by force. Before 1928 most Russians lived in the countryside. The technology used by peasants was primitive, and there were few incentives to be productive. Indeed, the last vestiges of Russian feudalism were eradicated only shortly before the First World War. There was thus huge unrealized economic potential from reallocating this labor from agriculture to industry. Stalinist industrialization was one brutal way of unlocking this potential. By fiat, Stalin moved these very poorly used resources into industry, where they could be employed more productively, even if industry itself was very inefficiently organized relative to what could have been achieved. In fact, between 1928 and 1960 national income grew at 6 percent a year, probably the most rapid spurt of economic growth in history up until then. This quick economic growth was not created by technological change, but by reallocating labor and by capital accumulation through the creation of new tools and factories. Growth was so rapid that it took in generations of Westerners, not just Lincoln Steffens. It took in the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States. It even took in the Soviet Union’s own leaders, such as Nikita Khrushchev, who famously boasted in a speech to Western diplomats in 1956 that “we will bury you [the West].” As late as 1977, a leading academic textbook by an English economist argued that Soviet-style economies were superior to capitalist ones in terms of economic growth, providing full employment and price stability and even in producing people with altruistic motivation. Poor old Western capitalism did better only at providing political freedom. Indeed, the most widely used university textbook in economics, written by Nobel Prize–winner Paul Samuelson, repeatedly predicted the coming economic dominance of the Soviet Union. In the 1961 edition, Samuelson predicted that Soviet national income would overtake that of the United States possibly by 1984, but probably by 1997. In the 1980 edition there was little change in the analysis, though the two dates were delayed to 2002 and 2012. Though the policies of Stalin and subsequent Soviet leaders could produce rapid economic growth, they could not do so in a sustained way. By the 1970s, economic growth had all but stopped. The most important lesson is that extractive institutions cannot generate sustained technological change for two reasons: the lack of economic incentives and resistance by the elites. In addition, once all the very inefficiently used resources had been reallocated to industry, there were few economic gains to be had by fiat. Then the Soviet system hit a roadblock, with lack of innovation and poor economic incentives preventing any further progress. The only area in which the Soviets did manage to sustain some innovation was through enormous efforts in military and aerospace technology. As a result they managed to put the first dog, Leika, and the first man, Yuri Gagarin, in space. They also left the world the AK-47 as one of their legacies. Gosplan was the supposedly all-powerful planning agency in charge of the central planning of the Soviet economy.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Inequality in the modern world largely results from the uneven dissemination and adoption of technologies,
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Economic growth Stalin style was simple: develop industry by government command and obtain the necessary resources for this by taxing agriculture at very high rates. The communist state did not have an effective tax system, so instead Stalin “collectivized” agriculture. This process entailed the abolition of private property rights to land and the herding of all people in the countryside into giant collective farms run by the Communist Party. This made it much easier for Stalin to grab agricultural output and use it to feed all the people who were building and manning the new factories. The consequences of this for the rural folk were calamitous. The collective farms completely lacked incentives for people to work hard, so production fell sharply. So much of what was produced was extracted that there was not enough to eat. People began to starve to death. In the end, probably six million people died of famine, while hundreds of thousands of others were murdered or banished to Siberia during the forcible collectivization. Neither the newly created industry nor the collectivized farms were economically efficient in the sense that they made the best use of what resources the Soviet Union possessed. It sounds like a recipe for economic disaster and stagnation, if not outright collapse. But the Soviet Union grew rapidly. The reason for this is not difficult to understand. Allowing people to make their own decisions via markets is the best way for a society to efficiently use its resources. When the state or a narrow elite controls all these resources instead, neither the right incentives will be created nor will there be an efficient allocation of the skills and talents of people. But in some instances the productivity of labor and capital may be so much higher in one sector or activity, such as heavy industry in the Soviet Union, that even a top-down process under extractive institutions that allocates resources toward that sector can generate growth. As we saw in chapter 3, extractive institutions in Caribbean islands such as Barbados, Cuba, Haiti, and Jamaica could generate relatively high levels of incomes because they allocated resources to the production of sugar, a commodity coveted worldwide. The production of sugar based on gangs of slaves was certainly not “efficient,” and there was no technological change or creative destruction in these societies, but this did not prevent them from achieving some amount of growth under extractive institutions.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
The process of economic growth and the inclusive institutions upon which it is based create losers as well as winners in the political arena and in the economic marketplace. Fear of creative destruction is often at the root of the opposition to inclusive economic and political institutions.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Such critical junctures are important because there are formidable barriers against gradual improvements, resulting from the synergy between extractive political and economic institutions and the support they give each other. The persistence of this feedback loop creates a vicious circle. Those who benefit from the status quo are wealthy and well organized, and can effectively fight major changes that will take away their economic privileges and political power.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Tradicionalmente, la economía ha ignorado la política, pero la comprensión de la política resulta esencial para explicar la desigualdad del mundo.
Daron Acemoğlu
Por qué fracasan los países: Los orígenes del poder Quotes la prosperidad y la pobreza Quotes
but it also meant that there were checks within Parliament against any single group becoming too powerful and abusing its power. It was the critical factor in the emergence of pluralistic political institutions.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Federal intervention to change the institutions in the South started with the decision of the Supreme Court in 1944 that primary elections where only white people could stand were unconstitutional. As we have seen, blacks had been politically disenfranchised in the 1890s with the use of poll taxes and literacy tests (pages 351–357). These tests were routinely manipulated to discriminate against black people, while still allowing poor and illiterate whites to vote. In a famous example from the early 1960s, in Louisiana a white applicant was judged literate after giving the answer “FRDUM FOOF SPETGH” to a question about the state constitution. The Supreme Court decision in 1944 was the opening salvo in the longer battle to open up the political system to blacks, and the Court understood the importance of loosening white control of political parties.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
In North Korea, the state built an education system to inculcate propaganda, but was unable to prevent famine. In colonial Latin America, the state focused on coercing indigenous peoples. In neither type of society was there a level playing field or an unbiased legal system. In North Korea, the legal system is an arm of the ruling Communist Party, and in Latin America it was a tool of discrimination against the mass of people. We call such institutions, which have opposite properties to those we call inclusive, extractive economic institutions—extractive because such institutions are designed to extract incomes and wealth from one subset of society to benefit a different subset.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
el obstáculo principal para la adopción de políticas que reducirían los fallos del mercado y fomentarían el crecimiento económico no es la ignorancia de los políticos, sino los incentivos y los límites a los que se enfrentan desde las instituciones políticas y económicas de sus sociedades.
Daron Acemoğlu
Por qué fracasan los países: Los orígenes del poder Quotes la prosperidad y la pobreza Quotes
Though the early growth in Botswana relied on meat exports, things changed dramatically when diamonds were discovered. The management of natural resources in Botswana also differed markedly from that in other African nations. During the colonial period, the Tswana chiefs had attempted to block prospecting for minerals in Bechuanaland because they knew that if Europeans discovered precious metals or stones, their autonomy would be over. The first big diamond discovery was under Ngwato land, Seretse Khama’s traditional homeland. Before the discovery was announced, Khama instigated a change in the law so that all subsoil mineral rights were vested in the nation, not the tribe. This ensured that diamond wealth would not create great inequities in Botswana. It also gave further impetus to the process of state centralization as diamond revenues could now be used for building a state bureaucracy and infrastructure and for investing in education. In Sierra Leone and many other sub-Saharan African nations, diamonds fueled conflict between different groups and helped to sustain civil wars, earning the label Blood Diamonds for the carnage brought about by the wars fought over their control. In Botswana, diamond revenues were managed for the good of the nation.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Westerners, not just Lincoln Steffens. It took in the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States. It even took in the Soviet Union’s own leaders, such as Nikita Khrushchev, who famously boasted in a speech to Western diplomats in 1956 that “we will bury you [the West].” As late as 1977, a leading academic textbook by an English economist argued that Soviet-style economies were superior to capitalist ones in terms of economic growth, providing full employment and price stability and even in producing people with altruistic motivation. Poor old Western capitalism did better only at providing political freedom. Indeed, the most widely used university textbook in economics, written by Nobel Prize–winner Paul Samuelson, repeatedly predicted the coming economic dominance of the Soviet Union. In the 1961 edition, Samuelson predicted that Soviet national income would overtake that of the United States possibly by 1984, but probably by 1997. In the 1980 edition there was little change in the analysis, though the two dates were delayed to 2002 and 2012. Though the policies of Stalin and subsequent Soviet leaders could produce rapid economic growth, they could not do so in a sustained way. By the 1970s, economic growth had all but stopped. The most important lesson is that extractive institutions cannot generate sustained technological change for two reasons: the lack of economic incentives and resistance by the elites. In addition, once all the very inefficiently used resources had been reallocated to industry, there were few economic gains to be had by fiat. Then the Soviet system hit a roadblock, with lack of innovation and poor economic incentives preventing any further progress. The only area in which the Soviets did manage to sustain some innovation was through enormous efforts in military and aerospace technology. As a result they managed to put the first dog, Leika, and the first man, Yuri Gagarin, in space. They also left the world the AK-47 as one of their legacies. Gosplan was the supposedly all-powerful planning agency in charge of the central planning of the Soviet economy. One of the benefits of the sequence of five-year plans written and administered by Gosplan was supposed to have been the long time horizon necessary for rational investment and innovation. In reality, what got implemented in Soviet industry had little to do with the five-year plans, which were frequently revised and rewritten or simply ignored. The development of industry took place on the basis of commands by Stalin and the Politburo, who changed their minds frequently and often completely revised their previous decisions. All plans were labeled “draft” or “preliminary.” Only one copy of a plan labeled “final”—that for light industry in 1939—has ever come to light. Stalin himself said in 1937 that “only bureaucrats can think that planning work ends with the creation of the plan. The creation of the plan is just the beginning. The real direction of the plan develops only after the putting together of the plan.” Stalin wanted to maximize his discretion to reward people or groups who were politically loyal, and punish those who were not. As for Gosplan, its main role was to provide Stalin with information so he could better monitor his friends and enemies. It actually tried to avoid making decisions. If you made a decision that turned out badly, you might get shot. Better to avoid all responsibility. An example of what could happen
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
model broke down,
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
There should be no presumption that any critical juncture will lead to a successful political revolution or to change for the better. History is full of examples of revolutions and radical movements replacing one tyranny with another, in a pattern that the German sociologist Robert Michels dubbed the iron law of oligarchy, a particularly pernicious form of the vicious circle.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
As we will show, poor countries are poor because those who have power make choices that create poverty. They get it wrong not by mistake or ignorance but on purpose.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Growth was so rapid that it took in generations of Westerners, not just Lincoln Steffens. It took in the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States. It even took in the Soviet Union’s own leaders, such as Nikita Khrushchev, who famously boasted in a speech to Western diplomats in 1956 that “we will bury you [the West].” As late as 1977, a leading academic textbook by an English economist argued that Soviet-style economies were superior to capitalist ones in terms of economic growth, providing full employment and price stability and even in producing people with altruistic motivation. Poor old Western capitalism did better only at providing political freedom. Indeed, the most widely used university textbook in economics, written by Nobel Prize–winner Paul Samuelson, repeatedly predicted the coming economic dominance of the Soviet Union. In the 1961 edition, Samuelson predicted that Soviet national income would overtake that of the United States possibly by 1984, but probably by 1997. In the 1980 edition there was little change in the analysis, though the two dates were delayed to 2002 and 2012. Though the policies of Stalin and subsequent Soviet leaders could produce rapid economic growth, they could not do so in a sustained way. By the 1970s, economic growth had all but stopped. The most important lesson is that extractive institutions cannot generate sustained technological change for two reasons: the lack of economic incentives and resistance by the elites. In addition, once all the very inefficiently used resources had been reallocated to industry, there were few economic gains to be had by fiat. Then the Soviet system hit a roadblock, with lack of innovation and poor economic incentives preventing any further progress. The only area in which the Soviets did manage to sustain some innovation was through enormous efforts in military and aerospace technology. As a result they managed to put the first dog, Leika, and the first man, Yuri Gagarin, in space. They also left the world the AK-47 as one of their legacies. Gosplan was the supposedly all-powerful planning agency in charge of the central planning of the Soviet economy. One of the benefits of the sequence of five-year plans written and administered by Gosplan was supposed to have been the long time horizon necessary for rational investment and innovation. In reality, what got implemented in Soviet industry had little to do with the five-year plans, which were frequently revised and rewritten or simply ignored. The development of industry took place on the basis of commands by Stalin and the Politburo, who changed their minds frequently and often completely revised their previous decisions. All plans were labeled “draft” or “preliminary.” Only one copy of a plan labeled “final”—that for light industry in 1939—has ever come to light. Stalin himself said in 1937 that “only bureaucrats can think that planning work ends with the creation of the plan. The creation of the plan is just the beginning. The real direction of the plan develops only after the putting together of the plan.” Stalin wanted to maximize his discretion to reward people or groups who were politically loyal, and punish those who were not. As for Gosplan, its main role was to provide Stalin with information so he could better monitor his friends and enemies. It actually tried to avoid making decisions. If you made a decision that turned out badly, you might get shot. Better to avoid all responsibility. An example of what could happen
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Egypt is poor precisely because it has been ruled by a narrow elite that have organized society for their own benefit at the expense of the vast mass of people.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Congo, vividly illustrates how political institutions determine economic institutions and, through these, the economic incentives and the scope for economic growth.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Noha Hamed, twenty-four, a worker at an advertising agency in Cairo, made her views clear as she demonstrated in Tahrir Square: “We are suffering from corruption, oppression and bad education.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Many studies estimate that only about 10 or at most 20 percent of aid ever reaches its target.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
In the case of China, the growth process based on catch-up, import of foreign technology, and export of low-end manufacturing products is likely to continue for a while.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Nations fail when they have extractive economic institutions, supported by extractive political institutions that impede and even block economic growth.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Fear of creative destruction is often at the root of the opposition to inclusive economic and political institutions.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Fruits of unsustainable extractive growth: Zheng He’s ship alongside Columbus’s Santa Maria Gregory A. Harlin/National Geographic Stock
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
after 1688 the state began to rely more on talent and less on political appointees, and developed a powerful infrastructure to run the country.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
As the United States began to experience the Industrial Revolution in the first half of the nineteenth century, Mexico got poorer.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
selling patents was a good idea only for someone like Edison, who had ideas faster than he could put them to practice. (He had a world-record 1,093 patents issued to him in the United States and 1,500 worldwide.)
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Many citizens in Rome did not need to work: they lived off the handouts from the government.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Pluralism also creates a more open system and allows independent media to flourish, making it easier for groups that have an interest in the continuation of inclusive institutions to become aware and organize against threats to these institutions. It is highly significant that the English state stopped censoring the media after 1688. The media played a similarly important role in empowering the population at large and in the continuation of the virtuous circle of institutional development in the United States, as we will see in this chapter.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
in which the Soviets did manage to sustain some innovation was through enormous efforts in military and aerospace technology. As a result they managed to put the first dog, Leika, and the first man, Yuri Gagarin, in space. They also left the world the AK-47 as one of their legacies.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Growth thus moves forward only if not blocked by the economic losers who anticipate that their economic privileges will be lost and by the political losers who fear that their political power will be eroded.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Yes, countries such as Syria and Egypt are poor, and their populations are primarily Muslim. But these countries also systemically differ in other ways that are far more important for prosperity. For one, they were all provinces of the Ottoman Empire, which heavily, and adversely, shaped the way they developed. After Ottoman rule collapsed, the Middle East was absorbed into the English and French colonial empires, which, again, stunted their possibilities. After independence, they followed much of the former colonial world by developing hierarchical, authoritarian political regimes with few of the political and economic institutions that, we will argue, are crucial for generating economic success. This development path was forged largely by the history of Ottoman and European rule. The relationship between the Islamic religion and poverty in the Middle East is largely spurious.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
even if industry itself was very inefficiently organized relative to what could have been achieved. In fact, between 1928 and 1960 national income grew at 6 percent a year, probably the most rapid spurt of economic growth in history up until then.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Slavery and the slave trade in Africa further disrupted family and marriage structures and may also have reduced fertility.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
The great inequality of the modern world that emerged in the nineteenth century was caused by the uneven dissemination of industrial technologies and manufacturing production. It was not caused by divergence in agricultural performance.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Improved health and life expectancy were not the cause of England’s economic success but one of the fruits of its previous political and economic changes.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
The average Egyptian has an income level of around 12 percent of the average citizen of the United States and can expect to live ten fewer years; 20 percent of the population is in dire poverty. Though these differences are significant, they are actually quite small compared with those between the United States and the poorest countries in the world, such as North Korea, Sierra Leone, and Zimbabwe, where well over half the population lives in poverty.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
In fact, it is known that a major technological innovation, the introduction of the steel axe among the group of Australian Aboriginal peoples known as Yir Yoront, led not to more intense production but to more sleeping, because it allowed subsistence requirements to be met more easily, with little incentive to work for more.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
stimulating sustained economic growth required that individuals use their talent and ideas, and this could never be done with a Soviet-style economic system.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
In fact, Egypt is poor precisely because it has been ruled by a narrow elite that have organized society for their own benefit at the expense of the vast mass of people.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
The pattern of vicious circle depicted by the transition between Haile Selassie and Mengistu, or between the British colonial governors of Sierra Leone and Siaka Stevens, is so extreme and at some level so strange that it deserves a special name. As we already mentioned in chapter 4, the German sociologist Robert Michels called it the iron law of oligarchy. The internal logic of oligarchies, and in fact of all hierarchical organizations, is that, argued Michels, they will reproduce themselves not only when the same group is in power, but even when an entirely new group takes control. What Michels did not anticipate perhaps was an echo of Karl Marx’s remark that history repeats itself—the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
revolution that overthrew Mubarak will lead to a new set of institutions capable of bringing prosperity
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
1791 the French National Assembly emancipated French Jewry. The
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
For example, a merchant in a colony such as New Spain, roughly modern Mexico, could not trade directly with anyone in New Granada, modern Colombia. These restrictions on trade within the Spanish Empire reduced its economic prosperity and also, indirectly, the potential benefits that Spain could have gained by trading with another, more prosperous empire.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
As we have seen, democracy is no guarantee that there will be pluralism. The contrast of the development of pluralistic institutions in Brazil to the Venezuelan experience is telling in this context. Venezuela also transitioned to democracy after 1958, but this happened without empowerment at the grassroots level and did not create a pluralistic distribution of political power. Instead, corrupt politics, patronage networks, and conflict persisted in Venezuela, and in part as a result, when voters went to the polls, they were even willing to support potential despots such as Hugo Chávez, most likely because they thought he alone could stand up to the established elites of Venezuela. In consequence, Venezuela still languishes under extractive institutions, while Brazil broke the mold.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Until 1726 they had to wear specific markers, two concentric yellow rings for men and a striped veil for women. All Jews had to pay a special poll tax.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
After all, if ignorance were the problem, well-meaning leaders would quickly learn what types of policies increased their citizens’ incomes and welfare, and would gravitate toward those policies.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
economist Abba Lerner noted in the 1970s, “Economics has gained the title Queen of the Social Sciences by choosing solved political problems as its domain.
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
One of the most notorious of these was Cornelius Vanderbilt, who famously remarked, “What do I care about the Law? Hain’t I got the power?
Daron Acemoğlu
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power Quotes Prosperity Quotes and Poverty Quotes
Popular Author
Friedrich Nietzsche
Jane Austen
Sherrilyn Kenyon
Oscar Wilde
William Shakespeare
Rick Riordan
Terry Pratchett
Haruki Murakami
Stephen King
Paulo Coelho
Popular Category
Truth
Poetry
God
Religion
Death
Writing
Inspirational
Life
Humor
Love
No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.
So many books, so little time.
A room without books is like a body without a soul.
Craig Johnson Books in Order
Lee Child Books in Order
Jack Reacher Books in Order